The prized only child of older parents, Toole began high school at twelve and finished at sixteen. He entered Tulane University as an engineering major—predictably, he was a teen-age math whiz—but switched to English after a year.
At twenty-two, Toole became the youngest professor in the history of Hunter College. In , he was drafted by the Army and wound up teaching English in Puerto Rico, where his innovative language classes earned him frequent accolades and promotions. He was also a talented mimic and a surprisingly graceful dancer. Reilly, who lives in New Orleans with his overweening mother, Irene. Even with Percy backing the book, it took three long years to place it.
It was written, with discipline, by a confident, steadily ascending young man. As for Ignatius, he appears to have been heavily modelled on Bobby Byrne, a burly and amply mustached medievalist whom Toole met while teaching at Southwestern Louisiana Institute.
Byrne, like Ignatius, believed that human society peaked around the fourteenth century and reliably dressed like a slob, much to the amusement of the always stylish Toole.
Following an argument with Thelma, he lit out on a two-month road trip that ended with him sticking a hose into his car near an unremarkable clearing in rural Mississippi. Of that reading I can recall only a vivid, tingling antipathy, akin to walking into a party and realizing instantly that you want to leave. The book, which has become a classic of Southern literature and a mainstay on college syllabi, is entertaining—by any metric, the work of a hugely promising young writer.
Toole would almost certainly have published better novels had he been given the opportunity to write them. Still, as I settled into the book again, twenty-three years later, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed it.
Although they argue constantly, they never do anything so banal as change their minds. Early in the novel, Ignatius stands outside a department store with his mother while a dim-witted police officer named Mancuso attempts to arrest him:.
When my brain begins to reel from my literary labors, I make an occasional cheese dip. But it was rare and arguably still unusual many decades later for a white author to delve into this racial thicket. Whereas Ignatius floats through the book living in a medieval fantasy, Jones is very much a man of his times who employs logic and gumption to obtain the outcome he desires.
Ignatius refers to Dorian Greene and his party-going friends as perverts, degenerates, deviates or sodomites. As with the African-American characters, Ignatius does not see them as individuals or real people so much as props to be used in his schemes to outmaneuver his misguided, social-activist girlfriend, Myrna Minkoff.
How many of the military leaders of the world may simply be deranged old sodomites acting out some fake fantasy role? Actually, this might be quite beneficial to the world. It could mean an end to war forever. Like Jones, Dorian has an identity completely independent of Ignatius, which suggests that he also has a high degree of self-awareness. This self-awareness is important because so many of the other featured characters—Ignatius, Irene, Myrna—appear to be entombed in the echo chambers of their own ideologies.
Dorian wants to have a good time and is an expert at shepherding his own happiness. In an interesting reversal, it is Dorian who manipulates Ignatius into providing the theme and free entertainment for a big party.
That Ignatius causes a scene is no surprise to Dorian. Just look at him. With his impulsive overreactions and lack of tact, Ignatius is the perfect lead for a brilliant satirical book, but he is virtually friendless.
In a rare turn, these events are described without caustic sarcasm or any attempt to divert the topic. There is another connection to Quixote here. The Man of La Mancha is said to have gone mad after reading too many romantic books about valorous knights.
Martin de Porres, the patron saint of mulattoes, and Fortuna, whose wheel of fate is always spinning in unexpected directions.
But this does not explain what caused Ignatius to lose himself in religious esoterica. Modern New Orleans is full of heartbroken people.
Racial tensions remain, with protests against police violence, racist monuments and unfair immigration policies regularly occurring. This is why Ignatius is such an indelible character. His most endearing traits are his love of outsiders and his visceral rejection of injustice. If Ignatius rematerialized on Canal Street today, he would likely wind up in a throng of young activists.
Or maybe he would find a job working alongside the underpaid kitchen staff of a tourist-trap restaurant. Or possibly he would find comfort among the homeless sheltering in Duncan Plaza.
This article was made possible by the Pulitzer Prize Centennial Campfires Initiative, a program to commemorate the th anniversary of the Prizes in Announced by the Pulitzer Prize Board, the Campfires Initiative aims to ignite broad engagement with the journalistic, literary, and artistic values the Prizes represent.
Subscription Give as a Gift. The final installment of our Pulitzer Prizes Centennial Campfire initiative. What brings him to the movie theater to shriek at the screen, and sits him in front of the television set to shriek at the screen screen shrieking's a favorite pastime of his , and leads him to denounce Professor Talc as a "deluded fool […] an 'anyone for tennis?
What, in short, makes Ignatius such a stinker? Ignatius himself would probably say " Boethius " again, allow us to suggest you don't skip the " Symbols " section in this guide. He would argue that he is motivated by the stoic medieval philosophy, and by the recognition "that striving is ultimately meaningless" Ignatius knows that "with the breakdown of the Medieval system, Chaos, Lunacy, and Bad Taste gained ascendency" 2.
In other words, the modern world is utterly rotten; Ignatius stands for a better, purer, less corrupt time, before all was decadent and corrupt.
But, in fact, there's nothing stoic about Ignatius and his constant complaining, and he loves the modern decadent world with all his heart and valve. He complains about Doris Day films, but he'd much rather watch those than an Ingmar Bergman film about good and evil and the salvation of the soul ahem, " Symbols " section.
There wasn't any Dr. Nutt cola back in the Middle Ages —and what would Ignatius do without Dr. There also weren't any hot dogs, and what would Ignatius do without hot dogs? Ignatius gets incredibly cranky if he can't wear his favorite hat; he'd hardly suffer calmly with Boethius while giant spikes were rammed into his head.
Ignatius, then, is not motivated by pure Medieval disdain for the modern world. So what does make him tick? Well, the thing that most consistently seems to motivate Ignatius is his ex-sort-of- girlfriend, the beat radical sex-advocate Myrna Minkoff. It's because he wants to impress Myrna that he tries to organize the uprising of black workers at Levy Pants, figuring that the progressive Myrna will be bitter with envy if Ignatius organizes a real Civil Rights demonstration.
Similarly, it's because he wants to impress Myrna that he tries to get Dorian involved in organizing a political party based on homosexuality, a venture that back in the s he feels sure will shock even the ultra-liberal Myrna. And finally, it's to spite Myrna, in large part at least, that Ignatius tries to find the Boethius-reading woman in the pornographic picture. It's almost as if describing sex to Myrna would be more fun than the sex itself. Much of Ignatius's bumping, disastrous progress through the novel, then, is because he is pursuing, or being pursued by, thoughts of Myrna.
Ignatius hasn't escaped into Medieval indifference; on the contrary, he's enmeshed in that most modern of entanglements: the romance.
You know how she makes trouble'" 6. Ignatius isn't much for personal responsibility, in case you hadn't noticed.
0コメント